Public Education – Incentive to Fail

September 14, 2010

A recent article in the Memphis Commercial Appeal entitled “MCS Sets Stage for Test-Results Shock” tells us that the Memphis City School system is failing to educate the children of Memphis, and since it is failing in such spectacular fashion, it is entitled to more money.

We learn from the article that Memphis City Schools Superintendent Kriner Cash predicts that city math scores could be in the low teens – at least 30 points into the new “fail zone” – as a result of higher grading standards and more difficult tests.

Teacher Appreciation – public domain, US Census

You may recall that due to a recent court decision, $57 million has to come from the city budget for the schools system, and Mayor Wharton has ordered across the board cuts to comply with the court’s order.

In addition to that, under the guidelines in Tennessee’s application for federal funding in the state’s Race To The Top program, Tennessee was one of two states awarded more than $500 million, with Memphis City Schools due to receive $68.5 million.

Despite this funding, in July of this year Governor Bredesen said Tennessee was seeking a waiver from federal No Child Left Behind requirements, including academic progress. Superintendent Cash said the waiver is unlikely.

Why can’t we educate our children despite all the funding? Perhaps it is because the goal of education is no longer helping children use their minds better for critical thinking and individual responsibility. Instead it is to control their conduct and thinking and direct those things toward a set of federally-approved objectives.

That is what the No Child Left Behind program is about: the sacrifice of individuality for the advancement of the group as a whole.

Cooperative non-learning promotes a lowest common denominator, group consensus approach to problem solving. Since there are no absolute values or standards held by the group, we develop a valueless, morally bankrupt society.

Photo credit: alternatephotography

What are the results of all this education for our children and for our society?

We have a bunch of sick children on our hands and a society with extremely high social costs that we just can’t seem to find an answer for. Each year American children lag behind their peers in the developed world in math and the natural sciences. Reading skills continue to decline year after year due to whole language non-reading programs that destroy children’s reading ability, thus crippling them for life.

Rampant sexual promiscuity at ever-earlier grades leads to pregnancies at ever-earlier grades. Since we have no values, we have no answers, and as a result we just teach them how to do it better and safer.

Rampant drug and alcohol abuse are the norm. Discipline is forbidden, so children are drugged into compliance, and when that doesn’t work they are arrested.

What then is the solution? Homeschooling, religious schools, other private schools and schools controlled and funded locally if local communities want publicly-funded education. Return to basics, especially in reading, math, and the sciences.


Another Open Letter to Gov. Bobby Jindal

August 13, 2010

Dear Gov. Jindal:

I’m really starting to like getting your letters.

In today’s letter, for example, you mention that your state is at war.  Here’s an excerpt:

“Our state is in a war on many fronts today. Down on the coast, our communities are fighting to save their livelihoods because of the BP oil spill. Our people have also been impacted by the job-killing policies coming out of Washington, D.C., including the federal government’s arbitrary and capricious deepwater drilling moratorium. Of course these challenges are also coming on the heels of a national economic downturn…”

That’s pretty straight-forward, Governor: your state is in a war to save its jobs and its people’s livelihoods. Instead of being a help or at least a benign presence, the federal government is actually causing Louisiana harm. If I may take modest liberty with your words: Washington, D.C., is your adversary in the war you are fighting.

Well, you are not alone. Washington, D.C., is at war with a lot of people right now. Sometimes it seems like just about the entire human race.

Now, let’s talk just about the “national economic downturn” as you put it. Your words are very kind, but if I may, I would like to point out a few things about this national economic downturn:

  • There are now a record 40.8 million people on food stamps. That is the 18th consecutive month of record-setting increases. Approximately 1 of every 8 people in America depend on food stamps to live.
  • Millions of people are losing their homes in foreclosure and the rate is rapidly increasing.
  • The federal government spent trillions of taxpayer dollars buying toxic debt from private banks and Wall Street firms, but the unemployment rate continues to increase.

Where’s the recovery we are constantly told we are in? There is no recovery and there will be no recovery in the long term because for there to be a recovery, using the current economic formulas, it would mean that there are no laws or even rules of economics.

From BobbyJindal.com

Here’s another excerpt from your letter:

“The statistics show we have already made amazing progress but as I said at our kickoff yesterday–this isn’t just about numbers, it’s about changing people’s lives. We must build a better Louisiana for our children than the one we inherited. We cannot and will not be the first generation that leaves fewer opportunities than we had.”

Good luck with that, Governor, because you are going to need it. We’ve already mentioned some of the results of our economic troubles, but the causes we have not discussed.

The cause, of course, is massive debt that can never be paid. For the first time in American history, we have come to realize that our debt cannot be paid and  that fact will collapse our economy sooner or later. When the bond market understands that we cannot pay our debt, interest rates will have to rise, or  the Fed will have to start printing money to buy our own debt, which will be very inflationary.

But wait a minute, didn’t I read yesterday that the Fed announced that it will begin doing  just that? What that means is that a private banking cartel, with the license of the federal government, will create money, loan it to the federal government at low interest so the federal government can continue to spend money it doesn’t have, on things that aren’t necessary or even helpful, until it finally collapses under the weight of its own stupidity.

This is all complete madness isn’t it? The whole country has gone stark raving mad. That is the legacy that the neocons and progressives have left to our children.

How then, Governor, can our children have better lives than we’ve had? I ask you, how we can overcome what these lunatics have done to our children? Are we going to continue to reward them for that? I hope and pray that we don’t.

Good luck, Governor,

Darrell L. Castle

(To sign up for Gov. Jindal’s newsletter, visit BobbyJindal.com.)


Tennesseans Not Quite Ready For Revolution

August 10, 2010

Knoxville mayor Bill Haslam easily defeated his two closest rivals in the August 5th Republican primary for governor of Tennessee.

Haslam received about 52% of the vote to 27% for Wamp and about 16% for Ramsey. Those numbers represent a significant victory for a moderate Republican selected by the people who are presumed to be the state’s most conservative voters. In other words, it wasn’t even close.

Why did the election go the way it did? Haslam, a very wealthy man, got in the race early and spent a lot of his own money. He is a businessman and mayor of one of the state’s four largest cities, just as Gov. Bredesen was when he won the election eight years ago. Haslam is handsome and charismatic and says nothing better than any of the others, but I don’t think any of those things represent the reason the election went the way it did.

The real reason is that Tennessee and Tennesseans are just not ready for the revolution that we read so much about. Voters are supposed to be angry at government – so angry that they want to send a message that they will not take it anymore. Well, Tennesseans sent a message on August 5th, and that message was “give us more of the same.”

Tennesseans obviously think that Governor Bredesen has done a good job during his eight years in office. They remember the economic shambles left by his predecessor, Don Sundquist, and they would like just to avoid a repeat of that.

Wamp and Ramsey campaigned by accusing Haslam of not being conservative enough, and it obviously didn’t work. Haslam was able to convince voters that his business experience combined with his experience running Knoxville give him the necessary credentials to lead the state economically.

That seems to be what people are concerned about now: economics. It’s a mistake to use labels such as liberal, conservative, left and right because voters are wise to the fact that most of the time the labels are meaningless. “Do I have a job, can I find a job, can I keep my house and car, and can I feed my family without public assistance?” are the kinds of questions people want answers for today.

If you are planning on being a candidate for executive office, you had better be prepared to answer those questions. Not many people take the time to discuss economic theory with voters. Either candidates don’t understand it, or they assume voters don’t understand it and don’t care to.

People do appreciate a candidate who is willing to tell them why everything is so fouled up and what he or she plans to do about it if elected. None of the candidates did that as far as I was able to determine, but voters assumed that Haslam has the formula for prosperity because he is a successful businessman. The campaign attack against him that he is an “oil billionaire” fell on deaf ears.

Wamp has the disadvantage of a 15-year voting record in Congress, and hopefully voters could see that his words do not match his record, which supported the Republican Congressional leadership more that 94% of the time. That would seem to make him the establishment candidate, but he failed to understand that fact. He at least didn’t campaign around it.

Ramsey’s brand of conservatism didn’t work either, and that surprises me, but only a little. To my knowledge, he said very little about the economy or why his political thought is the best  choice economically.

In the end, the advice given to Bill Clinton is still correct. It’s the economy, stupid.

- Darrell Castle


Ron Ramsey’s Comments About Islam Examined

July 30, 2010

During Republican candidate for governor Ron Ramsey’s speech at his Chattanooga campaign stop on July 14, he was quoted widely as having said: “You could even argue whether being a Muslim is actually a religion, or is it a nationality, way of life, cult or whatever you want to call it?”

According to the Chattanooga Times Free Press, Ramsey made the remark in response to an attendee’s stated concern that “we’ve got a threat that’s invading our country from the Muslims.” Ramsey also noted a recent controversy in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, over a proposal to build  an Islamic center and mosque.

The Times Free Press also quoted Ramsey as saying, “you cross the line when they start trying to bring Sharia law here into the United States…We live under the Constitution and they preferably live under our Constitution. It’s scary if we get there.” Sharia, of course, is the law of Islam and it is not compatible with the U.S. Constitution.

Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Washington, D.C.-based Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), an organization that many people suspect to be a front for terrorists, said Tuesday that the problem with Ramsey’s remarks is “it seems to be part of a trend nationwide in which there are those who are seeking to de-legitimize the faith of Islam so that Muslim civil rights can somehow be restricted.”

Ramsey emphasized that he is OK with peaceful, freedom-loving Muslims, but that he has problems with those who advocate violence against Americans.

Well what American does not have a problem with people who advocate violence toward Americans? Mr. Ramsey is a candidate for Governor of Tennessee, and if elected, would be charged with protecting those Americans living in Tennessee, so that seems perfectly reasonable.

Benssam Issa, a member of the board for the Islamic Society of Greater Chattanooga, said he believes that “at the end of the day, this country stands for freedom of religion” and “when you have one third of the population of the world following that religion, how could you deny it as a religion?”

Good point, Mr. Issa, and good question also. However, I must point out that Mr. Ramsey didn’t say that Islam is not a religion, but only that the argument could be made.

The country is supposed to stand for freedom of religion. That’s certainly what the Constitution and the 1st Amendment require. So Mr. Hooper is correct in one sense and that is that the civil rights of most, if not all, Americans are under attack. That statement is true regardless of faith or no faith. Denial of Habeas Corpus rights knows no faith, a warrantless search knows no faith, being held without charges and without right to counsel knows no faith, and torture certainly knows no faith.

Perhaps we should be concentrating on the loss of our basic rights and not trying to judge Mr. Ramsey’s heart or motive.

- Darrell Castle


Ramsey to Tour Shelby County

July 21, 2010


The Ron Ramsey for Governor campaign comes to Shelby County this Thursday and Friday, July 22nd and 23rd. This is an opportunity for those of you who support Ron Ramsey’s campaign to meet him and participate in his volunteer tour of Shelby County.

Those who wish to participate are urged to be at the Memphis Headquarters of the Ramsey campaign, located at 925 Yates near Poplar, at 4:00pm on Thursday and/or Friday.

More information on the tour is available at the campaign’s website.

Ramsey is a strong supporter of 2nd Amendment rights, as we all should be. He has also said that as governor, he will veto any legislation that Memphis may get passed allowing it to incorporate itself and Shelby County.

I don’t mean to put words in his mouth, but that could mean that he understands the significance of the movement toward consolidation and he supports the rights of individuals over those of the collective. If so, he finds himself in the company of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison.

Darrell L. Castle


Tennessee Governor Candidates Debate

July 15, 2010

The four candidates for Governor of Tennessee participated in a televised debate Monday night at Belmont University in Nashville – their last scheduled debate before the August 5th primary.

The candidates are Democrat Mike McWherter, who has no opposition in the Democratic primary, and Republicans Bill Haslam, Zach Wamp, and Ron Ramsey.

The candidates themselves consider Haslam to be the man to beat. That is only my opinion,  but I make it based on the way they “tore into him” according to a report in the Commercial Appeal. Usually the contenders feel the need to knock the front-runner down in a debate.

Knoxville Mayor Bill Haslam

Here are some highlights of the debate:

Haslam was widely criticized for refusing to disclose his tax returns. “What are you hiding’” asked McWherter. Haslam insisted that releasing his returns would make public the returns of others and that all sources of income have been revealed.

Ron Ramsey criticized Congressman Wamp for his congressional vote in favor of the bailout bill. “How do you justify taking our grandchildren’s money to bail out Wall Street barons? ” Ramsey asked. Wamp responded by saying that the nation’s banking industry was about to fall “off a cliff” and there were fears that depositors would not be able to withdraw their money.

TN Rep. Zach Wamp

I must comment for a moment on Congressman Wamp’s vote and his answer to the question. His answer is complete nonsense. There were no fears beyond F.D.I.C. insurance coverage. He simply voted to transfer trillions of dollars of bad debts owed by large banking houses to the backs of U.S. taxpayers. He seems rather ashamed of that vote now, as he well should be.

My conclusion from watching and reading summaries of this debate is that it was a very good thing, because it revealed conclusively that except for Ron Ramsey, there’s not a bit of difference between the rest of them. Ramsey is the only one who at least gives the impression that he understands what’s coming toward us and how a governor should defend his people.

- Darrell Castle


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 114 other followers